> Actually, lots of non-packagized modules get installed to site-packages > -- they just wind up right in site-packages, rather than in a > subdirectory of it. > > I've always thought this directory was misnamed -- should have been > "site-lib" or something. Oh well. The name doesn't matter that much. I think this is a fine use of site-packages. > For the record, the Distutils don't currently support the "application" > model of installation that Guido wants. It's on the (unofficial, > notional, blue-sky) to-do list. At least this admission saves me wasting time trying to force distutils into submssion. :-) --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4