A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2000-November/010594.html below:

[Python-Dev] Re: [Python-checkins] CVS: python/nondist/peps pep-0042.txt,1.43,1.44

[Python-Dev] Re: [Python-checkins] CVS: python/nondist/peps pep-0042.txt,1.43,1.44Moshe Zadka Moshe Zadka <moshez@math.huji.ac.il>
Tue, 14 Nov 2000 11:20:01 +0200 (IST)
On Mon, 13 Nov 2000, Guido van Rossum wrote:

> +     - Killing a thread from another thread.  Or maybe sending a
> +       signal.  Or maybe raising an asynchronous exception.
> + 
> +       http://sourceforge.net/bugs/?func=detailbug&bug_id=121115&group_id=5470

In general, killing threads in considered a bad idea. It is usually much
better to design the application properly, and being aware that a thread
doing nothing is not that big a deal.

--
Moshe Zadka <moshez@math.huji.ac.il> -- 95855124
http://advogato.org/person/moshez




RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4