> following up on myself: SRE uses inline only if USE_INLINE is enabled, > and it's appears to be disabled in the 2.0 code base, for all platforms > except Windows (don't recall doing this; maybe someone else thought > that 10-20% performance hit was good enough?). and now that Fred > has removed portable inline support, I cannot switch it on again :-( Can you explain yourself better, Fredrik? I don't think that USE_INLINE was ever defined. I'd gladly accept a patch to configure.in that defines USE_INLINE if 'inline' seems accepted by the compiler. > besides, do people really expect to be able to use one compiler when > running configure, and another to compile Python? sounds like they're > asking for it... Yes! C++ uses include the same headers that were used to compile Python, and C++ definitely qualifies as a different compiler... --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4