I wrote: > > Remove AC_C_INLINE test from configure.in, since the only place the symbol > > occurs in the Python sources appears to be as text in comments. We do not > > want to interfere with C++ keywords! > > did you benchmark SRE before and after this change? following up on myself: SRE uses inline only if USE_INLINE is enabled, and it's appears to be disabled in the 2.0 code base, for all platforms except Windows (don't recall doing this; maybe someone else thought that 10-20% performance hit was good enough?). and now that Fred has removed portable inline support, I cannot switch it on again :-( besides, do people really expect to be able to use one compiler when running configure, and another to compile Python? sounds like they're asking for it... </F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4