On Sun, 5 Nov 2000, Greg Stein wrote: > Euh... is process getting in the way of progress? Perhaps. Well, I won't let it get in the way more then a few more hours -- I'll allocate myself a PEP. It's easier to get forgiveness then permission <wink> > I'm not sure what you're saying here. That a PEP author should develop the > PEP entirely in private? Only when it is fully-cooked, that it should be > published? Far from it. Only tht the discussion tends to clutter up Python-Dev too much, so I want to moderate it by way of private mail to me-> checking to the PEP. I hope everyone here trust me to be honest enough not to censor competing points. > Bleh. A PEP should be a work-in-progress. Publish an empty version. Publish > a first draft. Revise. Revise. Revise. I intend to. > Comments on PEPs are generated when people feel their are listened to. If a > PEP author develops a PEP entirely in secret All future revisions will be in the Python CVS. Only security through obscurity can keep me secret there <wink> -- Moshe Zadka <moshez@math.huji.ac.il> -- 95855124 http://advogato.org/person/moshez
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4