[Moshe Zadka] > Well, of course they are rational numbers. The only question is whether 1.0 > should be inexact or exact. While that is not specified in the PEP (which > was meant for Barry to assign me a PEP number primarily...), I think > the principle of least suprise would be to treat 1.0 as inexact. [Martin v. Loewis] > To long-term Python users, that would be the least surprise. And to long term users of C/Perl/etc., once they map the numerical concepts correctly. But I hardly thing we should be arguing about this at this stage: I'm willing to leave this as an open issue in the PEP, if this is all you find wrong with it... And a request to all Python-Devvers: please direct comments directly to me, and I promise I'll summarize them all in the PEP. As soon as I get a PEP number, I'll publish an updated version, with all objections and open issues sumarized. -- Moshe Zadka <sig@zadka.site.co.il>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4