> > It's not inherently wrong. It just points out an omission in the PEP: > > it doesn't talk about the meaning of number literals. > > That's right -- but I did mean that floating-point literals will be > inexact. Remind you that your model has no notion of floating-point numbers - then what the heck are floating-point literals? The numbers that you can write in a base-10 notation are all rational numbers, and the point doesn't really float in them... Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4