Thomas Wouters writes: > Actually, no, it isn't easily fixable, if at all. The problem is mostly the > scientific notation: > > 1.e5 You could strongly encourage people to spell this 1.0e5
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4