David Ascher wrote: > > > S 207 pep-0207.txt Rich Comparisons Ascher > > S 208 pep-0208.txt Reworking the Coercion Model Ascher > > > Two of these (207, 208) haven't been written yet -- but I know roughly > > what they will contain, so they are included in this list, and not in > > the lists of vaporware PEPs later in PEP 0 (Incomplete and Empty > > PEPs). These may be reconsidered for Python 2.1 if their authors care > > to follow the PEP guidelines. > > I would _love_ to find someone to take over PEP ownership of these. I > feel terrible that I haven't been able to find the time to do those right > (although I only feel moral ownership of 207, not 208, where others have > much more in-depth knowledge). > > If someone wants to take over, please speak up and grab them. I'll try to > find the time to share the information I have, would gladly give the very > early and now obsolete patches I wrote up. I can take over the coercion PEP: I've been working on this before (see the proposal on my Python Pages). I would also like to know whether the PEP-0224 will be considered for 2.1 if I update the patch to make it a little more robust w/r to the problems mentioned in that PEP -- I'd really like to see this in Python soon, since it makes documenting Python programs so much easier. Note that I won't get around to do much work on these before January... way too busy at the moment :-/ -- Marc-Andre Lemburg ______________________________________________________________________ Business: http://www.lemburg.com/ Python Pages: http://www.lemburg.com/python/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4