[Barry A. Warsaw] > If we get lexical scoping, there should be a fast (built-in) way to > get at all the accessible names from Python. I.e. currently I can do > > d = globals().copy() > d.update(locals()) > > and know that `d' contains a dictionary of available names, with the > right overloading semantics. It was long ago agreed (don't you love how I pull this stuff out of thin historical air <wink>?) that if nested lexical scoping was added, we would need also to supply a new mapping object that mimicked the full Python lookup rules (including builtins). Not necessarily a dictionary, though.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4