>>>>> "GS" == Greg Stein <gstein@lyra.org> writes: GS> On Thu, 2 Nov 2000, Moshe Zadka wrote: >> This is a tool problem, and should be solved with good tools. Of >> course, installing the corret tools in people's minds will >> require some technological discoveries. GS> Bleck. Those tools are a crutch to deal with a poor language GS> design / feature. And are those tools portable? Are they part of GS> everybody's standard tool set? Will vi, emacs, and MS DevStudio GS> all have those capabilities? Are you saying that compilers are a crutch and we should get rid of them? I don't think you intend that, but this is a completely straightforward tool to build. It is needed only for backwards compatibility -- to identify scripts that depend on the changed behavior. There is no need for vi, emacs, or devstudio to understand what's going on. Jeremy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4