On Wed, 31 May 2000, Ka-Ping Yee wrote: > On Wed, 31 May 2000, Greg Stein wrote: > > Hmm. How about this: you stated the premise is to generate proposals for > > language features, extensions, additions, whatever. If that is the only > > goal, then consider a web-based system: anybody can post a "feature" with > > a description/spec/code/whatever; each feature has threaded comments > > attached to it; the kicker: each feature has votes (+1/+0/-0/-1). > > Gee, this sounds familiar. (Hint: starts with an R and has seven > letters.) Why are we using Jitterbug again? Does anybody even submit > things there, and still check the Jitterbug indexes regularly? > > Okay, Roundup doesn't have voting, but it does already have priorities > and colour-coded statuses, and voting would be trivial to add. Does Roundup have a web-based interface, where I can see all of the features, their comments, and their votes? Can the person who posted the original feature/spec update it? (or must they followup with a modified proposal instead) Cheers, -g -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4