ping wrote: > The reason i'm mentioning this here is that, in the course of > doing that, i put all the introspection work in a separate > module called "inspect.py". It's at >=20 > http://www.lfw.org/python/inspect.py > ... > > I think most of this stuff is quite generally useful, and it > seems good to wrap this up in a module. I'd like your thoughts > on whether this is worth including in the standard library. haven't looked at the code (yet), but +1 on concept. (if this goes into 1.6, I no longer have to keep reposting pointers to my "describe" module...) </F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4