Andrew Kuchling <akuchlin@mems-exchange.org>: > Eric S. Raymond writes: > >Here's a function that ought to be in the Python wrapper associated with > >the module: > > There currently is no such wrapper, but there probably should be. > Guess I'll rename the module to _curses, and add a curses.py file. Or > should there be a curses package, instead? That would leave room for > more future expansion. Guido, any opinion? I'll supply a field-editor function with Emacs-like bindings, too. -- <a href="http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr">Eric S. Raymond</a> Never trust a man who praises compassion while pointing a gun at you.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4