Skip Montanaro wrote:
>
> Christian> While I have to say that
>
> >>>> " ".join("123")
> Christian> '1 2 3'
> >>>>
>
> Christian> is not a feature to me but just annoying ;-)
>
> More annoying than
>
> >>> import string
> >>> string.join("123")
> '1 2 3'
>
> ? ;-)
You are right. Equally bad, just in different flavor.
*gulp* this is going to be a can of worms since...
> a-sequence-is-a-sequence-ly y'rs,
Then a string should better not be a sequence.
The number of places where I really used the string sequence
protocol to take advantage of it is outperfomed by a factor
of ten by cases where I missed to tupleise and got a bad
result. A traceback is better than a sequence here.
oh-what-did-I-say-here--duck--but-isn't-it-so--cover-ly y'rs - chris
p.s.: the Spanish Inquisition can't get me since I'm in Russia
until Sunday - omsk
--
Christian Tismer :^) <mailto:tismer@appliedbiometrics.com>
Applied Biometrics GmbH : Have a break! Take a ride on Python's
Kaunstr. 26 : *Starship* http://starship.python.net
14163 Berlin : PGP key -> http://wwwkeys.pgp.net
PGP Fingerprint E182 71C7 1A9D 66E9 9D15 D3CC D4D7 93E2 1FAE F6DF
where do you want to jump today? http://www.stackless.com
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4