I posted a couple of patches a couple of days ago to correct the string methods implementing slice-like optional parameters (count, find, index, rfind, rindex) to properly clamp slice index values to the proper range (any PyInt or PyLong value is acceptible now). In fact the slice_index() function that was being used in ceval.c was reused (renamed to _PyEval_SliceIndex). As well, the other patch changes PyArg_ParseTuple's 'b', 'h', and 'i' formatters to raise an OverflowError if they overflow. Trent p.s. I thought I would whine here for some more attention. Who needs that Unicode stuff anyway. ;-)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4