Andrew M. Kuchling writes: >Guido van Rossum writes: >My suggested criterion is that 1.6 not screw things up in a way that >we'll regret when 1.7 rolls around. UTF-8 probably does back us into >a corner that Doh! To complete that paragraph: Magic conversions assuming UTF-8 does back us into a corner that is hard to get out of later. Magic conversions assuming Latin1 or ASCII are a bit better, but I'd lean toward the draconian solution: we don't know what we're doing, so do nothing and require the user to explicitly convert between Unicode and 8-bit strings in a user-selected encoding. --amk
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4