M.-A. Lemburg wrote: > Guido van Rossum wrote: > >=20 > > > > So what do you think of my new proposal of using ASCII as the = default > > > > "encoding"? >=20 > How about using unicode-escape or raw-unicode-escape as > default encoding ? (They would have to be adapted to disallow > Latin-1 char input, though.) >=20 > The advantage would be that they are compatible with ASCII > while still providing loss-less conversion and since they > use escape characters, you can even read them using an > ASCII based editor. umm. if you disallow latin-1 characters, how can you call this one loss-less? looks like political correctness taken to an entirely new level... </F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4