On Tue, 28 Mar 2000, Fredrik Lundh wrote: > > > IMO this subdivision could be discussed and possibly revised. > > here's one proposal: > http://www.pythonware.com/people/fredrik/librarybook-contents.htm Wow. I don't think i hardly ever use any of the modules in your "Commonly Used Modules" category. Except traceback, from time to time, but that's really the only one! Hmm. I'd arrange things a little differently, though i do like the category for Data Representation (it should probably go next to Data Storage though). I would prefer a separate group for interpreter-and-development-related things. The "File Formats" group seems weak... to me, its contents would better belong in a "parsing" or "text processing" classification. urlparse definitely goes with urllib. These comments are kind of random, i know... maybe i'll try putting together another grouping if i have any time. -- ?!ng
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4