> proposal: if anyone changes the API for a fundamental module, and > fails to update the standard library, the change is automatically "minus > one'd" for each major module that no longer works :-) > > (in this case, that would be -5 or so...) Oops. Sigh. While we're pretending that this change goes in, could you point me to those five modules? Also, we need to add test cases to the standard test suite that would have found these! --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4