> I really, really, like the Perl mechanism, and I think we would do well > to think if something like that wouldn't suit us, with minor > modifications. The biggest modification which I think is needed to a Perl-like organization is that IMO there is value in knowing what packages are 'blessed' by Guido. In other words, some sort of Q/A mechanism would be good, if it can be kept simple. [Alternatively, let's not put a Q/A mechanism in place and my employer can make money selling that information, the way they do for Perl! =)] > (Remember that lwall copied the Pythonic module mechanism, > so Perl and Python modules are quite similar) That's stretching things a bit (the part after the 'so' doesn't follow from the part before), as there is a lot more to the nature of module systems, but the point is well taken. --david
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4