A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2000-March/002817.html below:

[Python-Dev] module reorg (was: 1.6 job list)

[Python-Dev] module reorg (was: 1.6 job list) [Python-Dev] module reorg (was: 1.6 job list)Moshe Zadka Moshe Zadka <mzadka@geocities.com>
Sat, 25 Mar 2000 20:30:26 +0200 (IST)
On Sat, 25 Mar 2000, David Ascher wrote:

> This made me think of one issue which is worth considering -- is there a
> mechanism for third-party packages to hook into the standard naming
> hierarchy?  It'd be weird not to have the oracle and sybase modules within
> the db toplevel package, for example.

My position is that any 3rd party module decides for itself where it wants
to live -- once we formalized the framework. Consider PyGTK/PyGnome,
PyQT/PyKDE -- they should live in the UI package too...




RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4