> > One thing you can definitely do now which breaks no code: propose a > > package hierarchy for the standard library. > > I already did! > > http://www.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2000-February/003761.html > > *grumble* You've got to be kidding. That's not a package hierarchy proposal, it's just one package (network). Without a comprehensive proposal I'm against a partial reorganization: without a destination we can't start marching. Naming things is very contentious -- everybody has an opinion. To pick the right names you must see things in perspective. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4