> bwarsaw@cnri.reston.va.us writes: > > I know, I was being purposefully dense for effect :) Fred, is there > > some way to make the html contain a link to the previous section for > > the "see above" text? That would solve the problem I think. [Fred] > No. I expect this to no longer be a problem when we push to > SGML/XML, so I won't waste any time hacking around it. > On the other hand, lots of places in the documentation refer to > "above" and "below" in the traditional sense used in paper documents, > and that doesn't work well for hypertext, even in the strongly > traditional book-derivation way the Python manuals are done. As soon > as it's not in the same HTML file, "above" and "below" break for a lot > of people. So it still should be adjusted at an appropriate time. My approach to this: put more stuff on the same page! I personally favor putting an entire chapter on one page; even if you split the top-level subsections this wouldn't have happened. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4