> Note that some of the problems stem from CVS access. Much Guido-time could > be saved by a commit-then-review model, rather than review-then-Guido- > commits model. Fred does this very well with the Doc/ area. Actually, I'm experimenting with this already: Unicode, list.append() and socket.connect() are done in this way! For renames it is really painful though, even if someone else at CNRI can do it. I'd like to see a draft package hierarchy please? Also, if you have some time, please review the bugs in the bugs list. Patches submitted with a corresponding PR# will be treated with priority! --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4