Greg Stein writes: > Or in the "network" package that was suggested a month ago? +1 > And why *can't* we start on repackaging old module? I think the only > reason that somebody came up with to NOT do it was "well, if we don't > repackage the whole thing, then we should repackage nothing." Which, IMO, > is totally bogus. We'll never get anywhere operating under that principle. That doesn't bother me, but I tend to be a little conservative (though usually not as conservative as Guido on such matters). I *would* like to decided theat 1.7 will be fully packagized, and not wait until 2.0. As long as 1.7 is a "testing the evolutionary path" release, I think that's the right thing to do. -Fred -- Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake at acm.org> Corporation for National Research Initiatives
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4