Hi! > > > | try: > > > | del None > > > | except SyntaxError: > > > | pass # Wow running Py3K here! > > > > Barry A. Warsaw: > > > I know how to break your Py3K code: stick None=None some where higher > > > up :) > Ken Manheimer: > Huh. Does anyone really think we're going to catch SyntaxError at > runtime, ever? Seems like the code fragment above wouldn't work in the > first place. Ouuppps... Unfortunately I had no chance to test this with Py3K before making a fool of myself by posting this silly example. Now I understand what Barry meant. So if None really becomes a keyword in Py3K we can be sure to catch all those imaginary 'del None' statements very quickly. Regards, Peter -- Peter Funk, Oldenburger Str.86, D-27777 Ganderkesee, Germany, Fax:+49 4222950260 office: +49 421 20419-0 (ArtCom GmbH, Grazer Str.8, D-28359 Bremen)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4