On Thu, 23 Mar 2000 bwarsaw@cnri.reston.va.us wrote:
> See, you can't catch that SyntaxError because it doesn't happen at
> run-time. Maybe you meant to wrap the try suite in an exec? Here's a
Huh. Guess i should have read barry's re-response before i posted mine:
Desperately desiring to redeem myself, and contribute something to the
discussion, i'll settle the class/static method naming quandry with the
obvious alternative:
> > p.classMethod("hey, cool!") # also selfless
These should be called buddha methods - no self, samadhi, one with
everything, etc.
There, now i feel better.
:-)
Ken
klm@digicool.com
A Zen monk walks up to a hotdog vendor and says "make me one with
everything."
Ha. But that's not all.
He gets the hot dog and pays with a ten. After several moments
waiting, he says to the vendor, "i was expecting change", and the
vendor say, "you of all people should know, change comes from inside."
That's all.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4