BAW> It would seem to me that distutils is a better way to go for
BAW> kjbuckets. The core already has basic sets (via dictionaries).
BAW> We're pretty much just quibbling about efficiency, API, and syntax,
BAW> aren't we?
Yes (though I would quibble with your use of the word "quibbling" ;-). If
new syntax is in the offing as some have proposed, why not go for a more
efficient implementation at the same time? I believe Aaron has maintained
that kjbuckets is generally more efficient than Python's dictionary object.
Skip
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4