>>>>> "SM" == Skip Montanaro <skip@mojam.com> writes:
SM> Any reason why kjbuckets and friends have never been placed in
SM> the core? If, as it seems from the discussion, a set type is
SM> a good thing to add to the core, it seems to me that Aaron's
SM> code would be a good candidate implementation/foundation.
It would seem to me that distutils is a better way to go for
kjbuckets. The core already has basic sets (via dictionaries). We're
pretty much just quibbling about efficiency, API, and syntax, aren't
we?
-Barry
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4