Moshe Zadka wrote: > > On Mon, 20 Mar 2000, Ka-Ping Yee wrote: > > > I think that at this point the possibilities for doing sets > > come down to four options: > > > > > > 1. use lists > > 2. use dicts > > 3. new type > > 4. do nothing > > 5. new Python module with a class "Set" > (The issues are similar to #3, but this has the advantage of not changing > the interpreter) Perhaps someone could take Aaron's kjbuckets and write a Python emulation for it (I think he's even already done something like this for gadfly). Then the emulation could go into the core and if people want speed they can install his extension (the emulation would have to detect this and use the real thing then). -- Marc-Andre Lemburg ______________________________________________________________________ Business: http://www.lemburg.com/ Python Pages: http://www.lemburg.com/python/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4