On Mon, 20 Mar 2000, Ka-Ping Yee wrote: > I think that at this point the possibilities for doing sets > come down to four options: > > > 1. use lists > 2. use dicts > 3. new type > 4. do nothing 5. new Python module with a class "Set" (The issues are similar to #3, but this has the advantage of not changing the interpreter) -- Moshe Zadka <mzadka@geocities.com>. http://www.oreilly.com/news/prescod_0300.html http://www.linux.org.il -- we put the penguin in .com
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4