A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2000-March/002663.html below:

[Python-Dev] re: Using lists as sets

[Python-Dev] re: Using lists as sets [Python-Dev] re: Using lists as setsMoshe Zadka Moshe Zadka <mzadka@geocities.com>
Mon, 20 Mar 2000 17:03:47 +0200 (IST)
On Mon, 20 Mar 2000 gvwilson@nevex.com wrote:

> [After discussion with Ping, and weekend thought]
> 
> I would like to vote against using lists as sets:

I'd like to object too, but for slightly different reasons: 20-something
lines of Python can implement a set (I just chacked it) with the new 
__contains__. We can just suply it in the standard library (Set module?)
and be over and done with. 
Moshe Zadka <mzadka@geocities.com>. 
http://www.oreilly.com/news/prescod_0300.html
http://www.linux.org.il -- we put the penguin in .com




RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4