Greg wrote: > > ...I can't think of a single reason why any sane programmer would be > > writing programs in Microsoft Word or whatever it is that you're > > talking about. >=20 > 'S funny --- my non-programmer friends can't figure out why any sane > person would use a glorified glass TTY like emacs... or why they = should > have to, just to program... I just think that someone's going to do = this > for some language, some time soon, and I'd rather Python be in the = lead > than play catch-up. I don't get it. the XML specification contains a lot of stuff, and I completely fail to see how adding support for a very small part of XML would make it possible to use XML editors to write Python code. what am I missing? </F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4