Tim Peters writes: > code that is in the core does work. One or the other has to change, and it > looks most likely to me that Fred will change the docs for 1.6. While not > ideal, that would be a huge improvement over the status quo. Actually, I just checked in my proposed change for the 1.5.2 doc update that I'm releasing soon. I'd like to remove it for 1.6, if the appropriate implementation is moved into the core. -Fred -- Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake at acm.org> Corporation for National Research Initiatives
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4