Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2000-March/002543.html below:

Fixing os.popen on Win32 => is the win32pipestuff going to be adopted?

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] FW: Fixing os.popen on Win32 => is the win32pipe stuff going to be adopted?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] FW: Fixing os.popen on Win32 => is the win32pipe stuff going to be adopted?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Greg Stein wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 9 Mar 2000, James C. Ahlstrom wrote:
> > Of course I wanted you to do it instead of me!  Well, if
> > I get any time before 1.6 comes out...
> 
> It *has* been done. Bill Tutt did it a long time ago. That's what
> win32pipe is all about.

Thanks for the heads up!

Unfortunately, win32pipe is not in the core, and probably
covers more ground than just popen() and so might be a
maintenance problem.  And popen() is not written in it anyway.
So we are Not There Yet (TM).  Which I guess was Tim's
original point.

JimA

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] FW: Fixing os.popen on Win32 => is the win32pipe stuff going to be adopted?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] FW: Fixing os.popen on Win32 => is the win32pipe stuff going to be adopted?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4