Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2000-March/002533.html below:

Fixing os.popen on Win32 => is the win32pipe stuff going to be adopted?

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] FW: Fixing os.popen on Win32 => is the win32pipe stuff going to be adopted?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] FW: Fixing os.popen on Win32 => is the win32pipe stuff going to be adopted?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

M.-A. Lemburg writes:
 > Ehm, hasn't anyone looked at the code I posted yesterday ?
 > It goes a long way to deal with these inconsistencies... even
 > though its not perfect (yet ;).

  I probably sent that before I'd read everything, and I'm not the one 
to change the popen() implementation.
  At this point, I'm waiting for someone who understands the details
to decide what happens (if anything) to the implementation before I
check in any changes to the docs.
  My inclination is to fix popen() on Windows to do the right thing,
but I don't know enough about pipes & process management on Windows to 
get into that fray.


  -Fred

--
Fred L. Drake, Jr.	  <fdrake at acm.org>
Corporation for National Research Initiatives

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] FW: Fixing os.popen on Win32 => is the win32pipe stuff going to be adopted?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] FW: Fixing os.popen on Win32 => is the win32pipe stuff going to be adopted?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4