Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2000-March/002516.html below:

Fixing os.popen on Win32 => is the win32pipe stuff going to be adopted?

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] FW: Fixing os.popen on Win32 => is the win32pipe stuff going to be adopted?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] FW: Fixing os.popen on Win32 ... code for thought.
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> > MAL:
> > > I'd suggest moving the popen from the C modules into os.py
> > > as Python API and then applying all necessary magic to either
> > > use the win32pipe implementation (if available) or the native
> > > C one from the posix module in os.py.
> > >
> > > Unless, of course, the win32 stuff (or some of it) makes it into
> > > the core.
[Guido]
> > No concrete plans -- except that I think the registry access is
> > supposed to go in.  Haven't seen the code on patches@python.org yet
> > though.
> 
> Ok, what about the optional "use win32pipe if available" idea then ?

Sorry, I meant please send me the patch!

--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] FW: Fixing os.popen on Win32 => is the win32pipe stuff going to be adopted?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] FW: Fixing os.popen on Win32 ... code for thought.
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4