Mike has a darned good point here. Anyone have a darned good answer <wink>? -----Original Message----- From: python-list-admin@python.org [mailto:python-list-admin@python.org] On Behalf Of Mike Fletcher Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2000 2:08 PM To: Python Listserv (E-mail) Subject: Fixing os.popen on Win32 => is the win32pipe stuff going to be adopted? Just reading one more post (and a FAQ) on the win32 pipe breakage (sewage all over the hard-disk, traffic rerouted through the bit-bucket, you aren't getting to work anytime soon Mrs. Programmer) and wondering why we have a FAQ instead of having the win32pipe stuff rolled into the os module to fix it. Is there some incompatibility? Is there a licensing problem? Ideas? Mike __________________________________ Mike C. Fletcher Designer, VR Plumber http://members.home.com/mcfletch -- http://www.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4