A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2000-March/002510.html below:

Fixing os.popen on Win32 => is the win32pipe stuff going to be adopted?

[Python-Dev] FW: Fixing os.popen on Win32 => is the win32pipe stuff going to be adopted? [Python-Dev] FW: Fixing os.popen on Win32 => is the win32pipe stuff going to be adopted?Tim Peters tim_one@email.msn.com
Wed, 8 Mar 2000 02:48:24 -0500
Mike has a darned good point here.  Anyone have a darned good answer <wink>?

-----Original Message-----
From: python-list-admin@python.org [mailto:python-list-admin@python.org]
On Behalf Of Mike Fletcher
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2000 2:08 PM
To: Python Listserv (E-mail)
Subject: Fixing os.popen on Win32 => is the win32pipe stuff going to be
adopted?

Just reading one more post (and a FAQ) on the win32 pipe breakage (sewage
all over the hard-disk, traffic rerouted through the bit-bucket, you aren't
getting to work anytime soon Mrs. Programmer) and wondering why we have a
FAQ instead of having the win32pipe stuff rolled into the os module to fix
it.  Is there some incompatibility?  Is there a licensing problem?

Ideas?
Mike
__________________________________
 Mike C. Fletcher
 Designer, VR Plumber
 http://members.home.com/mcfletch

-- 
http://www.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list





RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4