from "Python for Lisp Programmers":
http://www.norvig.com/python-lisp.html
> Don't forget return. Writing def twice(x): x+x is tempting
> and doesn't signal a warning or > ception, but you probably
> meant to have a return in there. This is particularly irksome
> because in a lambda you are prohibited from writing return,
> but the semantics is to do the return.=20
maybe adding an (optional but encouraged) "return"
to lambda would be an improvement?
lambda x: x + 10
vs.
lambda x: return x + 10
or is this just more confusing... opinions?
</F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4