On Sun, 5 Mar 2000, Tim Peters wrote: > [Tim] > >> [make Nanny a base class] > > [Moshe Zadka] > > Why? > > Because it's an obvious application for OO design. A common base class > formalizes the interface and can provide useful utilities for subclasses. The interface is just one function. You're welcome to have a do-nothing nanny that people *can* derive from: I see no point in making them derive from a base class. > > As a note, selfnanny uses the parser module AST. > > Understood, but selfnanny has a relatively trivial task. That it does, and it was painful. > >> [parser doesn't give source lines] > > > The parser module has source lines. > > No, it does not (it only returns terminals, as isolated strings). Sorry, misunderstanding: it seemed obvious to me you wanted line numbers. For lines, use the linecache module... > > You got some pointers? > > Download python2c (http://www.mudlib.org/~rassilon/p2c/) and grab > transformer.py from the zip file. I'll have a look. Moshe Zadka <mzadka@geocities.com>. http://www.oreilly.com/news/prescod_0300.html
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4