On Wed, Mar 01, 2000 at 06:07:07PM +0100, Vladimir Marangozov wrote:
> Guido van Rossum wrote:
> > Once we reach the end of the second list, all objects still left in
> > the first list are garbage. We can destroy them in a similar to the
> > way Neil does this in his code. Neil calls PyDict_Clear on the
> > dictionaries, and ignores the rest. Under Neils assumption that all
> > cycles (that he detects) involve dictionaries, that is sufficient. In
> > our case, we may need a type-specific "clear" function for containers
> > in the type object.
>
> Couldn't this be done in the object's dealloc function?
No, I don't think so. The object still has references to it.
You have to be careful about how you break cycles so that memory
is not accessed after it is freed.
Neil
--
"If elected mayor, my first act will be to kill the whole lot of you, and
burn your town to cinders!" -- Groundskeeper Willie
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4