On Wed, 1 Mar 2000, Fredrik Lundh wrote: > Greg Stein wrote: > > Note that Guido posted a note to c.l.py on Monday. I believe that meets > > your notification criteria. > > ahem. do you seriously believe that everyone in the > Python universe reads comp.lang.python? > > afaik, most Python programmers don't. Now you're simply taking my comments out of context. Not a proper thing to do. Ken said that he wanted notification along certain guidelines. I said that I believed Guido's post did just that. Period. Personally, I think it is fine. I also think that a CHANGES file that arrives with 1.6 that points out the incompatibility is also fine. >... > sigh. running checkappend over a 50k LOC application, I > just realized that it doesn't catch a very common append > pydiom. And which is that? Care to help out? Maybe just a little bit? Or do you just want to talk about how bad this change is? :-( Cheers, -g -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4