Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2000-June/005200.html below:

[Python-Dev] Hey! who changed sys.platform?!

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Hey! who changed sys.platform?!
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: [Python-checkins] CVS: python/dist/src/Lib/test/output test_gc,NONE,1.1
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> But I vote -1 on this one anyway -- it's too much code and almost by
> its very nature not something that belongs in a "standard" library.
> Plus, I don't want to be responsible for maintaining it.  Sorry,
>
> --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)

Not that I hope to override the heavy -1, but I don't agree with the second
point.  It embodies a huge amount of knowledge that is needed to write
portable code.  As such, IMO, it _does_ belong in the standard library.  How
is it different in its nature from sys.platform, which is only a much weaker
version of the same concept?

--david

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Hey! who changed sys.platform?!
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: [Python-checkins] CVS: python/dist/src/Lib/test/output test_gc,NONE,1.1
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4