A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2000-June/005089.html below:

[Python-Dev] build problems under MSVC 5.0

[Python-Dev] build problems under MSVC 5.0 [Python-Dev] build problems under MSVC 5.0Fredrik Lundh Fredrik Lundh" <effbot@telia.com
Thu, 29 Jun 2000 19:07:02 +0200
trent wrote:
> I think (am I wrong?) to generalize that the intention for both Win32 =
and
> Win64 is to have _beginthread return an unsigned pointer-sized =
integer: hence
> uintptr_t.
>=20
> This would eliminate the #ifdef but would require a typedef for =
uintptr_t on
> Win32. This can be done in PC/config.h (I already did this for =
intptr_t,
> because I needed *that* elsewhere.) Does this also need to be =
generalized to
> typedef uintptr_t whereever it is not defined, i.e. in the autoconf =
files.
>=20
> I can look at this this weekend, if that is soon enough.

I suggest checking in the #ifdef as a stopgap measure, if you
promise to come up with the right thing (whatever that is) in
time for 1.6 final.

Should I go ahead and check it in?

</F>




RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4