> There's already an IDLE distribution distinct from Python's: > > http://www.python.org/idle/ > > Note that the IDLE 0.5 there is not what was shipped with 1.5.2; I'm not > clear on why that hasn't been updated to IDLE 0.6 already (suspect just lack > of time). Yes. > > Hmm... I guess that I don't much have an opinion one way or the other, but > > was mostly looking for clarification. > > I don't have a specific plan in mind either -- just "me too"ing on the idea > that it would do no harm and possibly do real good to let these peripheral > (to the core) things live on their own schedules. I don't see any harm in > including "the latest" snapshot of them with the core distribution, > though -- it's handy for newcomers to get these things without needing to > search for them. I know I learned a lot about Python at the start from > browsing these directories. Additionally, it's great for Python on Windows to come with a working GUI. Pythonwin may be more like Windows, but it's much more fragile than (recent versions of) IDLE in my experience. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4