[Greg Stein]
> Are you suggesting that IDLE be separate from a Tools/Demo
> package, or that the whole bunch be shoved out into the wild?
There's already an IDLE distribution distinct from Python's:
http://www.python.org/idle/
Note that the IDLE 0.5 there is not what was shipped with 1.5.2; I'm not
clear on why that hasn't been updated to IDLE 0.6 already (suspect just lack
of time).
> Hmm... I guess that I don't much have an opinion one way or the other, but
> was mostly looking for clarification.
I don't have a specific plan in mind either -- just "me too"ing on the idea
that it would do no harm and possibly do real good to let these peripheral
(to the core) things live on their own schedules. I don't see any harm in
including "the latest" snapshot of them with the core distribution,
though -- it's handy for newcomers to get these things without needing to
search for them. I know I learned a lot about Python at the start from
browsing these directories.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4