On Wed, Jun 28, 2000 at 08:07:20PM -0400, Tim Peters wrote: > [Greg Stein] > > ... > > I'd throw Tools into the same thing [as Demos]. As a separate distro, > > you can have a faster release cycle. ... you could release Idle > > updates easily and distinctly from the Python core. > > Note that Guido gave his blessing for a "wide open" policy on IDLE (== its > own project in SourceForge, and anyone can be a developer). If that's a > success (& I predict it will be, provided someone actually bothers to set up > the SF project!), I'd like to see it spread to Tools and Demos too. Are you suggesting that IDLE be separate from a Tools/Demo package, or that the whole bunch be shoved out into the wild? Hmm... I guess that I don't much have an opinion one way or the other, but was mostly looking for clarification. Cheers, -g -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4