Andy Robinson writes: > I find the web interface totally unusable from IE5 and Netscape 4.XX, > working over 64k lines or dialup lines. Once one logs in via SSL, only > about one click in five ever returns a sensible page, and most just time out I've not been able to reproduce this behavior; the Web interface seems to work well with IE5 and Netscape 4.XX for me; the only problem I've had with IE5 is accessing a project's anonymous FTP area from the project page (IE5 just froze completely). Netscape didn't exhibit that problem for me and allowed perfectly reasonable use. Sometimes it seems a little slow, but I attribute that to load and the public-key crypto using SSH for CVS access; I understand that CVS doesn't have the most efficient wire-protocol either. I should note that I've mostly used it over T1 and cable modem links; I don't know that smaller pipes would make a huge difference though. I'd be more suspicious of trans-Atlantic linkage than anything else without having more information. Routing can do strange things, so you may be getting the worst-possible link for SourceForge while other things get better routes, but I wouldn't expect that to be terribly consistent. > How many people here have actually created accounts for themselves on > SourceForge and tried to do stuff when logged in - raise bugs and so on? > Did it work for you? We ought to get a few data points before making this > the way Python is managed. I've never had the kind of problems you describe. -Fred -- Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake at beopen.com> BeOpen PythonLabs Team Member
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4