Fredrik Lundh wrote: > someone really needs to fuse the patch manager with roundup (that > we should use roundup for bug tracking goes without saying...) How sweet! Why, thank you. :) Trent Mick wrote: > What are the chances of getting other meta data fields on patches, i.e. > changes to the patch manager? Categorizing patches could really help as a > filter. For instance, I may be a Unicode genius and would like to see the > patches associated with it. I agree that doing that kind of filtering is very useful. I have a discussion thingie (based on Roundup) at http://headspaces.com/. (Also prototype -- very prototype.) I hacked out the "status" and "fixer" fields and added a "keywords" field. Not much volume yet, but i think it will work well. Perhaps something like that for discussing patches? Jeremy Hylton wrote: > Maybe the right solution is to work with the SourceForge maintainers > to make roundup part of the standard support software. Hmmm... maybe i should look into that after i've figured out how super-Roundup is going to work. -- ?!ng
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4